?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Dear friends and readers,

Another thoroughly Emma letter: it mirrors the underlying mood of Emma.  In an earlier letter strongly anticipatory of Emma (letter 17) we saw Jane snubbed at a dance and, with the help of friends, fail to manipulate another man to dance with her: 


Louise Dylan as Harriet just as she overhears and watches Mr Elton refuse to dance with her (2009 BBC Emma)

This letter also reflects the ennui the Mansfield Parkers are determined to do away with by play-acting. But it epitomizes all that is so frustrating about what's left of Austen's letters and makes an attempt to get close to her this way (behind not just the modern biographies, but the family smothering framing) problematic at every turn.


Romola Garai as Emma feeling bleak after Mrs Weston's marriage, Jonny Lee Miller as Mr Knightley looking on (09Emma)

It's about the dullest letter thus far, a sea of trivia scarcely redeemed by the continual tone of muted sarcasm through out as Austen mimicks and tones of pleasure and happiness she imagines Cassandra would as a matter of piety couch her lucubrations from Godmersham in; and of "rejoicing" her own family and neighbors apply to their activities. By about half-way through Austen does break down and sudden unexplained resentments prod through ("but we knew a trick worth two of that") She imagines some disasters after erupting with local instances of drunkenness, horridness and the neighborhood's (enjoyment of) grieving over someone's bankruptcy.  Thus tedium is relieved and thus is she inspirited sufficiently so that tail-end leads to some  acid over how Edward might respond to tales of someone else's fancy house features -- though again she is at a loss, is driven to present something as what she promises to drop ever after (the weather, Steventon improvements) and goes into her liking of a gown, her mother's dislike, pink shoes with a return to her muted sarcasm as she manages to come up to entering into the fiction of charming journeys and gladness.

I called it "three very dull things indeed" because the one way it can have interest beyond the obvious question of why save this? is that by connecting it to Emma's insult of Miss Bates we can give new twist to the knives in that novel. It’s said that Austen deliberately gave herself the task to produce a novel which reflected the ordinary daily round -- though through the eyes of an heiress. show how aware Austen is (though she says as much in these letters) of the impoverished nature of what passes for stimulation in her daily round.  When Miss Bates comes up with three very dull things indeed I suggest that Austen is also seeing herself in Miss Bates, and Emma’s irritated cruelty in ridiculing the woman connects not only to Emma’s frustration at the inanity of what she daily has to put up with (as she tries to say to Mr Knightley) but to Austen’s pouring herself and her own life into Miss Bates too. Austen sees herself in both chief participants of this painful scene. The brilliance of Tamsin Grieg’s performance in the 2009 Emma is the actress does manage to convey self-awareness that she is absurd, dull, without resources. The actress playing Mrs Bates in this production is not just the first Mrs Bates to speak, but is filmed to show her pitying her daughter.


Tamsin Grieg as Miss Bates, a woman sensitive to every slight havin to force herself not to observe them (09 Emma)

Austen has her inner world -- the novels she’s produced and what she reads. We are scarcely allowed to see evidence of this in the letters thus far, but it probably was intensely disheartening to have these novels and not see them go anywhere either.

***********************************
The gap between letter 22 and letter 23 is eighteen months. We are now at the close or autumn months of 1800.  If we take the calendars or almanacs underlying Austen's novels seriously -- and I do -- Austen has now begun The Watsons -- it opens on a bad Tuesday, 13 October 1801. I assume such a date is predicated on a novel started sometime before that.  My calendar for MP suggests Litz's idea that drafts or fragments for MP were written 1796-97; and Kirkham has the first draft of Emma in 1802 or so, but a paradigm idea (young woman taking care of aging ill father, and two brothers) lodged in Austen's mind during the trip to Bath -- having seen Kotzebue's play. The letters have taught me how little Austen controlled her own time and also how easy she was to bully (she retreats so quickly before Cassandra and much of her outbursts in these letters is an attempt to find some release) so that just these bits of text may lie in her drawers makes sense.


Godmersham Park today, tourists included

The first line may suggest the local post office is pretty bad:  she has not been able to acknowledge receipt of a parcel sent her by Cassandra from London.  As the statement is articulated with an odd circumlocution, it may also be that she has not had time to write or been able to since Cassandra's last or some people in London failed her. Of course what would they care? her individual insignificance to anyone is being felt here.  But it's not clear as she talks of how she now hopes to be disappointed tomorrow (Sunday, when only one coach passes Steventon). 

More than a letter written on 23 June 1799 is missing here:

Then 5 lines parodying the supposed "very pleasant Journey" Cassandra would have been sure to attribute to herself, and how everyone is so well, Edward rejoicing, though the verb is not parody but seriously intended.  Jane thinks Edward is making up the idea he has been long absent from home. It seems that Edward and Elizabeth came with one of their brood to Steventon, then went to London with Cassandra (taking her as nursemaid-companion) and then to Godmersham. Some chestnuts were left behind; the chestnuts will be planted, the drawing destroyed.

Then the "exceeding busyess".  They have two or three times a day rejoiced at their very delightful weather, and they have themselves taken advantage of this great boon and visited neighbors.  Here we have Austen's irritation at the banality of perception: I wonder if the family really did piously talk like this. I doubt it so it's the family attitude of mind that annoys her, their pretenses, and that they use whatever comes to hand to drag her out socializing. Dean at Oakley Hall, ate sandwiches with mustard, admired someone's porter, someone else's transparencies.

Oh joy.

A present of two roots of hearts-ease to plant for Cassandra? The descriptions of it on the Net make me wonder if it was used as an herb in say tea to soothe the nerves.  So maybe Cassandra needed soothing after all.

Still more lines on this kind of thing only gradually Austen drops the pretense her relatives kept up too much for her taste. One decent thing here about Austen; the pleasantest tone is reserved for Betty Dawkins who I assume is some of the wretchedly poor who lived about these upper middle faux-gentry Austens.  Bet is "the most grateful of all whom Edward's charity has reached;" if she's not grateful (Austen refuses to believe in what she has no probable proof for and goes against her perception of human nature), she does express herself more warmly than the rest.  Then Harwoods and the same tiresome people always there ("forever"), then the wives one of whom fainted away from a long ride into "Lord Carnavon's Park" (let us hope it was pretty at any rate), and the other walked. It's this pair that gets the abrupt resentment; they were coming to Steventon but didn't make it. 

So "we know a trick worth two of that" refers to a real attitude of the Austens. They did what they could and successfully to prevent these women from coming.  Were they ashamed of a lack of richness about their dwelling?  JEAL tells us the vicarage left a lot to desire to those wanting prestige.  We've seen in other letters how alive the Austens are to snubs, how they will attribute snubs to behavior. The next sentence suggests that Jane herself wanted to get back at what she thinks was the hyprocrisy of these two women in pretending to want to visit the Austens:

"If I had thought of it in time, I would have said something civil to her (Mrs Augusta Bramsto) about Edward's never having a serious idea of calling on Mr Chute .... unluckily it did not occur to me."  In other words, she would have snarled had she thought of it.  Probably she would not have had the nerve to say it but manages to find relief in saying this to Cassandra.

A human contradiction is here: on the one hand, she really finds these visits so tiresome, yet when the very people who bored and irritate her so don't come to Steventon, she is resentful.

Yet more of this thwarted twaddle. Mrs Heathcote went home, Catherine (Biggs?) paid her an early visit at Dean promptly (Mrs Heathcote expected this?), good account of someone ill (Harris), James Ausetn to Winchester fair and back with a "new horse" with Mary getting a "new maid."

For a moment a piece of Popian wit almost comes out: a zeugman. Here are examples:

Or stain her honor, or her new brocade,
Forget her prayers, or miss a masquerade,

James returned with a new horse and new maid ...

A swipe at Mary here and then she elaborates the irony:  "two great acquisitions, one comes from Folly Farm, is about five years old, used to draw, & thought very pretty; &the other is neice to Dinah at Kintbury.

The joke is that "draw" and pretty" may be applied to both the maid and the horse.

James also called on Mr Bayle to inquire on behalf of Mr Austen why he is such a horrid man; Mr Bayle did not deny this but made apologies. I doubt this is what was literally said, but is a mockery of some conversation in which either James never mentioned the man's unpleasantness or one where James attempted to extract some acknowledgement of nastiness and the man pleaded not his own drunkenness but blamed a servant for being drunk. Perhaps Bayle is a carpenter for he gave James hopes of a table in a couple of weeks.

Sudden switch: no letter since Cassandra left, except one of a Bishop inquiring after the character of someone.  This is meant to show an implicit ugliness: the only letter they get is someone trying to find out something about someone else -- to their detraction probably, possibly over Mr Elton trying to get some employment or niche.

The onto the hypocrisy of the neighborhood pretending to grieve but enjoying the bankruptcy of someone (Mrs Martin failed, and an execution in her house -- poor woman, and Austen is aware of this). Note that it's the woman's brother & an associate who did this. So much for family loyalty but of course they did this to prevent others.

This is the sort of excuse people make when they say if I didn't fleece so-and-so someone else would have.  Another similar event at Wilson's and this makes for a fanciful nightmare by way of joking:

All this cruel behavior has made Austen "apprehensive that You, your fellow travellers 7 all your effects might be seized by Bailiffs when you stopt at the Crown & sold altogether for the benefit of creditors."

This brings Austen back by association to Mrs Bramston -- remember her, the lady showing off her transparencies. This is used as a weapon at Edward who is again presented as envying other people or doing something which someone with a conscience wouldn't.  It seems that in Mr Deeds's new house one of the sitting rooms is an "oval room with a Bow" [bow window] at one end: the case is there is a fireplace at the end of this oval room with a window on top of it (this would be the bow.

They (she and Cassandra) must forget this before they accuse Edward of envy. The reverse (or ironic) idea here is that Edward is justified in his envy because forsooth this new house has this feature that would arouse anyone's envy.


Elaborate bow-window: it would be difficult to have one of these over the mantelpiece of a fireplace 

This connects to Northanger Abbey where General Tilney has no bow window and excuses himself by saying there is nothing he detests (disdains, despises) so much as a patched-on bow. Now I see we are to assume the General is pea-green at people with bow-windows and in fact wishes the window had a bow.

I'm glad she has put her pen down until Sunday.

The real explanation for all this is frustration, a do-nothing life. No career for her and since she has not gotten herself a husband or doesn't want one, she is dragged about as a daughter. Her writing and reading her pleasures are (I assume) not valued for real because she never brings them up. Or if she did (remember the problematic nature of these letters), then Cassandra destroyed them -- by which one can again say what is Austen's lifeblood is not valued, something to be ashamed of in public.

Postscripts/Journalizing

On Sunday and Monday Austen wrote postscripts or did more journalizing,  The category you see these letters in depends on your perspective: I suggest we might see the letters to Cassandra as an intermittent journal done in similarly to Fanny Burney's to her sister, with the important difference that Fanny does not seem to worry about or fear her sister's reaction, but genuinely writes to her as a sheerly imagined self. 

Sunday:

After the opening gambit of apparently irresistible parody ("This morning's unpromising aspect ... absolutely necessary ... how peculiarly fortunate you are ...)" -- Austen just loathes the insistence she pretend all his fortunate, happy, good -- Austen at last has a second simple utterance she can say with calmness and appreciation:

"Our improvements have advanced very well; -- the Bank along the Elm Walk is sloped down for the reception of Thorns & Lilacs; & it is setled that the other side of the path is to continue turf'd & be planted with Beech, Ash, & Larch.

Two thoughts: it puts me in mind of Shakespeare's As You LIke It where the poet several times says no matter how unkind or absurd people, we can turn to nature for comfort.  I hasten to say I don't mean that Austen alludes to Shakespeare, but the implied opposition (not conscious on Austen's part) is the same.

Second, given the lack of any satisfaction until now (except maybe that Betty Dawkins has some sincerity in her thanks) this adherence to the grounds of the house would support the long held idea that Austen was very hurt, shocked, bitter when she was forced to give up this place to her older brother.

Monday: 

Here she is grateful for what she had hoped for at the opening of the letter has arrived. A Gown she likes (and of course Mrs Austen thinks it ugly). The stockings bring home her attitude to cheap stuff she is forced to put up with in other letters: she much prefers two pair of good qualty to three of inferior. (I'm with her there.)  The money angle is never forgotten. The combs are so pretty but she regrets Cassandra bought her so many.  (An act of kindness.)  In my queries on shoes I discovered that it was not uncommon in the era for people to wear what we'd call ill-fitting shoes: well, here's Austen remarking that the pink shoes fit well -- the others are faultless in doubtless other ways. (Shoes cost.)  This is a note of gratitude as I said:  now she says she is glad she has the cloak to expect, is grateful for a long letter while Cassandra was so hurried (I wonder why) and that "you have had so charming a day for your journey home."  Here she eschews irritation and professes to believe Cassandra; maybe Cassandra really did have a good day.


Emma's picture of Harriet: too tall (1972 BBC Emma)

More utterances of thanks.. Now though she goes back to making fun;  "the weather does not know know to be otherwise than fine;" she's surprised a woman should not be taller -- it's ever been thought a positive thing to be tall, but perhaps Cassandra has made a mistake and Mrs Marriot is taller.  We have an anticipation/echo of the dialogue over Emma making Harriet too tall -- in reverse.


Mr Roland - LeFaye guesses a hairdresser at Godmersham. So there was some occasion Cassandra was at from which she had that good day coming home.

Last PS: father likes his stockings and about the charges only objects to Mr Hancock's charge of 3 and 6 for the box.

The arrival of the package has mollified her. She rests easier, her heart is easier as she contemplates these things.



See 1&2, 3&4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9 , 10, 1112, 13, 14 , 15, 16 & 17 , 18, 19 , 20, 21 and 22.

Ellen

Comments

( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
misssylviadrake
May. 7th, 2011 04:32 am (UTC)
Another reading
Diane R:

"Jane Austen clearly has a style and we see it as she once more endeavors to make essentially the same round of events amusing. There is the repetition of the tiresome cliches about travel-the kind of voice I would argue carries over quite clearly into the novels as the "village choir." Jane here, to me, is saying, I know exactly what you and everyone else (or only everyone else) will say about the trip--the same commonplaces that people say so many times I know them by heart. (And behind that, the implicit complaint or yearning--can't anybody use language in more interesting way? Why must I continually suffer this?)

We see again an underlying vein of wanting quality in clothing--we saw it, obliquely, in her (unstated) preference for one good fake plum over a dozen sprigs of last year's fake flowers--we find it here in her preference for two good pairs of stocking versus three of inferior quality. There's a sense again of making do: the pink shoes fit, but she conveys less than an ecstatic response--I get the feeling again of her being clothed out of the charity barrel (of course, not quite that, but ...)

Her characteristic response to the seizure of the neighbor's goods ... the bankruptcy from a failed business ... is an identification with the victims and the anxiety that the empathy causes her to feel is turned into a high spirited joke--that she fears the same will happen to Cassandra and party as they travel. Of course, that's so over the top as to be ridiculous, but it does convey Austen's perception that "there but for the grace of God go I." Humor is her weapon for the lack of control she has over her life. She distances herself from the horror of poverty's sudden descent with wit. One wonders how deeply such scenes affected her; it must have been frightening to someone so dependent. (Why didn't the brothers who seize the goods to "protect" them bail out the business to save face, to save their relatives from humiliation and destitution?)

Again, the reader senses the boredom, the gentle mockery of being "exceedingly busy" or "doing a great deal," which turns out to be things like commenting on the good weather and eating mustardy sandwiches with the neighbors.

Perhaps some buried anger at the nephew--why not save his drawing or mail it to him rather than throw it on the fire? I think of S&S and the tiresome (although perfectly normal) children that the mother can see no wrong in--the complaint is towards the mother for being so egotistical as not to see that her "darlings" might not be endlessly amusing.

James's new horse and Mary's new maid equated as "acquisitions:" I find an acerbic of gallows humor in that.

Fascinating comments about the fireplace in the bow window with window above the mantlepiece--I'm trying to figure out where the chimney went: "the centre window of the bow, exactly over the mantel-piece."

************

A parallel to Emma that jumped to my mind is Emma glancing idly down the street and seeing the children staring at the gingerbread in the bow window of the bakery.As for the letter, I'm still trying to understand how a window could be directly above the mantlepiece--was it bowed around the chimney? If there were such a thing, wouldn't there be architectural references to it elsewhere? Or am I missing a
coded reference--since we're also on the subject of codes?

I have long been turning over that "bow window" in Emma in my mind, as I am of the school that every seemingly idle word in that novel means something ... not that I will use the dreaded term "subtext."



Edited at 2011-05-07 04:39 am (UTC)
misssylviadrake
May. 8th, 2011 01:25 am (UTC)
Arnie's reading (1); An Emma letter
What struck me about Letter 23 when I first read it closely a few years ago is that it has so many echoes of Emma, which supports the notion (which I heartily endorse) that Emma grew out of the ashes of The Watsons. It goes far beyond the resonance between Miss Bates and Jane Austen herself (which, by the way, I have been claiming since 2006) that Ellen has suggested in Austen L, because there are so many particular details which ring very specific bells. Here are the echoes/bells from Emma that I hear in Letter 23, written, it is important to realize, 15 years before JA edited the final proofs for Emma!: “I am not yet able to acknowledge the receipt of any parcel from London, which I suppose will not occasion you much surprise.-I was a little disappointed today, but not more than is perfectly agreable; & I hope to be disappointed again tomorrow, as only one coach comes down on Sundays” Although we find out at the end of the letter that JA is awaiting a gown that CEA ordered for her while passing through London en route to Godmersham, we are at this first point reminded of the delivery of the piano from London to Jane Fairfax. “You have had a very pleasant Journey of course, & have found Elizabeth & all the Children very well on your arrival at Godmersham, & I congratulate you on it. Edward is rejoicing this evening I dare say to find himself once more at home, from which he fancies he has been absent a great while.” The Christmas visit of the John Knightleys with all their children to Highbury, and in particularly John Knightley’s grumbling about traveling away from home. “His son left behind him the very fine chestnuts which had been selected for planting at Godmersham, & the drawing of his own which he had intended to carry to George; + the former will there-fore be deposited in the soil of Hampshire instead of Kent; the latter, I have already consigned to another Element.” Robert Martin gathering walnuts for Harriet. “…we have been obliged to take advantage of the delightful weather ourselves by going to see almost all our Neighbours.-On Thursday we walked to Deane, yesterday to Oakley Hall & Oakley, & today to Deane again.” Of course, that is Emma’s quotidian life in Highbury! “At Oakley Hall we did a great deal-eat some sandwiches all over mustard, admired Mr. Bramston's Porter & Mrs. Bramston's Transparencies, & gained a promise from the latter of two roots of hearts-ease, one all yellow & the other all purple, for you.” As Colleen Sheehan so brilliantly argued 10 years ago, the secret second answer to the _shorter_ charade in Chapter 9 of Emma is “heart’s ease”. “At Oakley we bought ten pair of worsted stockings, & a shift.” Emma and Harriet go to Ford’s. “The shift is for Betty Dawkins, as we find she wants it more than a rug.-She is one of the most grateful of all whom Edward's charity has reached, or at least she expresses herself more warmly than the rest, for she sends him a " sight of thanks." Emma and Harriet make their charitable outing. “James went to Winchester fair yesterday, & bought a new horse; & Mary has got a new maid-two great acquisitions, one comes from Folly Farm, is about five years old, used to draw, & thought very pretty; & the other is neice to Dinah at Kintbury.” Emma playfully saying to Knightley: “It was not Harriet's hand that he was certain of—it was the dimensions of some famous ox." And as I have mentioned in the past, the above passage from Emma must have been on Sholom Aleichem’s mind when he wrote the hilarious scene between Tevye and Lazar Wolf . “We have had no letter since you left us, except one from Mr. Serle of Bishop's Stoke to enquire the character of James Elton.-Our whole Neighbourhood is at present very busy greiving over poor Mrs. Martin, who has totally failed in her business, & had very lately an execution in her house.”

Arnie
misssylviadrake
May. 8th, 2011 01:26 am (UTC)
Arnie's reading (2)
Surely I do not even need to point out that these two sentences contain _four_ surnames from _Emma_-!-three are from the surnames of these real people (if indeed they are all real people, and if these events actually did take place, which, in my opinion, is far from certain) and one (Mrs. Stokes, the proprietor of the Crown Inn) from the name “Bishop’s Stoke”. “Her own Brother & Mr. Rider are the principal creditors, & they have seized her effects in order to prevent other people's doing it.-There has been the same affair going on, we are told, at Wilson's, & my hearing nothing of you makes me apprehensive that You, your fellow travellers & all your effects, might be seized by the Bailiffs when you stopt at the Crow & sold altogether for the benefit of the creditors.”

This droll sarcastic tale of a woman living on the economic edge, and then JA’s droll fantasy of CEA herself being sold to pay debts, of course reminds us of Miss Bates. And note that CEA s”stopt at the Crow”, which is only one letter away from “the CrowN”! “In talking of Mr. Deedes's new house, Mrs. Bramston told us one circumstance, which, that we should be ignorant of it before must make Edward's conscience fly into his face; she told us that one of the sitting rooms at Sandling, an oval room with a Bow at one end, has the very remarkable & singular feature of a fireplace with a window, the centre window of the Bow, exactly over the mantlepeice.-

Arnie (to be cont'd)
misssylviadrake
May. 8th, 2011 01:27 am (UTC)
Arnie's reading (3)
.-Sunday.” Ellen is right to hear an echo to General Tilney’s protesting too much about the lack of a bow window at Woodston, but there is another reference to a bow window in JA’s novels, and it is in Emma: “…a string of dawdling children round the baker's little bow-window eyeing the gingerbread…” “Our Improvements have advanced very well;-the Bank along the Elm Walk is sloped down for the reception of Thorns & Lilacs; & it is settled that the other side of the path is to continue turf'd & be planted with Beech, Ash, & Larch.-Monday.” And we have the following description of Harriet and the Gypsies: “About half a mile beyond Highbury, making a sudden turn, and deeply shaded by elms on each side, it became for a considerable stretch very retired….Miss Bickerton, excessively frightened, gave a great scream, and calling on Harriet to follow her, ran up a steep bank…” But here is the coup de grace, in terms of Emma echoes: “I am surprised that Mrs. Marriot should not be taller-Surely You have made a mistake.-Did Mr. Roland make you look well?” Of course this is Knightley commenting that Emma has drawn Harriet too tall! Cheers, ARNIE
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

November 2017
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow