Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

My usual round up of important articles in the past week or so:

To begin with, I regret to say a black man who remains nameless in most mainstream places -- whom the police refuse to tell the name of -- has been murdered in the streets of South Carolina. Shot dead. They got him in the knee first.  Since this is so common now, what purports this sentence? He was a central leader Black Lives Matter who tried to stay out of the radar to lay low. Hah!


Read on a bit, and you begin to get a name: it seems he is best known for when he grabbed a confederate flag in a crowd while Bree Newsome was skimmying up a flagpole in South Carolina to take one down. B'Haha is his last name. This public act (caught on a camera) is what he was best known for.

Dead in their thirties, shot, Medgar Evers, Martin Luther King, Mahammed X, now even nameless. The way to stop a movement is murder anyone who might be effectively leading it.

An officer, named, Michael Slager, is to be arraigned.

If you look here you find out, it's important because it's being reported in many minor papers:


Keep going and after a while you get his name:

Muhiyyidin Moye aka Muhiyyidin D'baha was killed at around 1 a.m. on February 6 after being shot while riding his bicycle, his niece, Camille Weaver, and then his photo; and I found a couple of decent ones on AP press

You see you don't have to worry about women, they never get into important power. The real reason Barack Obama won and then Donald Trump was they were running against a woman. We can shimmy up trees and take down flags, go bike-riding.  What does it matter what we do? Emma Goldman thought even the vote didn't matter.

I agree we are no longer safe in US streets, but not from immigrants or African-Americans or hispanic or Muslim people: we are not safe from and because of police behavior and policies.


Oh and how far have black people gotten in good jobs, good education, opportunities for fulfilling since the death Martin Luther King. Why, the numbers have hardly budged at all: " Black Americans Mostly Left Behind since Martin Luther King's Death" by Sharon Ausin, in The Conversation for February 7, 2018.


Typical black neighborhood street circa 1968

The air (radio, TV, Internet I don't visit) is filled with a perspective which is pernicious: the whole basic standpoint has become anti-immigrants, and the democrats speaking speak feebly and talk of disagreeing here "a bit" and there." If they are permitted to go, you find they disagree everywhere and strongly, but that is now how these voices of reason -- they have children who emigrated, workers should be given legal work permits, people are vetted and so on. But a turn has made to put anything but a white supremacist state on the weak defensive.

It's not individual choices either; it's the result of decades of explicit US policy. Read this review in the NYRB of an important book: The Color of Law by Jason DeParle of Richard Rothenstein's book, The Color of Law: when gov't drew the color lines:

Here the DeParle's opening:

In 2007 a sharply divided Supreme Court struck down plans to integrate the Seattle and Louisville public schools. Both districts faced the geographic dilemma that confounds most American cities: their neighborhoods were highly segregated by race and therefore so were many of their schools. To compensate, each district occasionally considered a student’s race in making school assignments. Seattle, for instance, used race as a tie-breaking factor in filling some oversubscribed high schools. Across the country, hundreds of districts had similar plans.
Justice Stephen G. Breyer, writing for the court’s liberal wing in the case, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, argued that the modest use of race served essential educational and democratic goals and kept faith with the Court’s “finest hour,” its rejection of segregation a half-century earlier in Brown v.Board of Education. But Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., representing a conservative plurality, called any weighing of race unconstitutional. “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race,” he wrote. Crucial to his reasoning was the assertion that segregation in Seattle and Louisville was de facto, not de jure—a product of private choices, not state action. Since the state didn’t cause segregation, the state didn’t have to fix it—and couldn’t fix it by sorting students by race.
Richard Rothstein, an education analyst at the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute, thinks John Roberts is a bad historian. The Color of Law, his powerful history of governmental efforts to impose housing segregation, was written in part as a retort. “Residential segregation was created by state action,” he writes, not merely by amorphous “societal” influences. While private discrimination also deserves some share of the blame, Rothstein shows that “racially explicit policies of federal, state, and local governments…segregated every metropolitan area in the United States.” Government agencies used public housing to clear mixed neighborhoods and create segregated ones. Governments built highways as buffers to keep the races apart. They used federal mortgage insurance to usher in an era of suburbanization on the condition that developers keep blacks out. From New Dealers to county sheriffs, government agencies at every level helped impose segregation—not de facto but de jure.
Rothstein calls his story a “forgotten history,” not a hidden one. Indeed, part of the book’s shock is just how explicit the government’s racial engineering often was ... (you have to pay to read the rest)

Dream again:

Better Homes, Better Gardens 1995 by Kerry James Marshall, exhibited in Seattle Art Show, 2018

Do you want to know who makes up M-13, how did it form, how come you've never heard of it before. The last first: anyone who thinks Trump an utter moron, think again: he or his people found this group as they made a perfect scapegoat for this SOTU and he wove into that speech 13 mentions, 15 minutes on them alone. They grew out of the death squads killing people and destroying the country of El Salvador (from which many immigrants fled at the time and try to today) by the US of A:



By the way on hospitals:  medical treatment in the US:  As I wrote, they got Muhiyyidin D'baha in the knee -- a delicate place -- and when he got to the hospital, while there died,

Me I hate hospitals. Never go there -- was dragged in my life there and in the US volunarily went the three times I let myself get pregnant. Well I was young. In the UK in 1967 when I was having a nervous breakdown all the UK young adults around me were astonished when I said it was perfectly okay in the US to sit and cry for hours, say in school infirmary, as long as you were out of sight. Why? it cost money to go hospital. Once I tried to kill myself (age 15), neither parent called a psychiatrist.  Are you kidding?

Every time I've gone I'm hit with bills even though I'm a Kaiser Patient.  After Jim died I was pursued by a debt collector for a company where I should not have had to pay that bill. Jim told me they would bill us and that was why he tried not to do the procedure or get a real paper from Kaiser that we were not responsible. Before he died, he told me to pay it. He didn't know I'd have to pay it twice before they left me alone.

Miss Drake


Feb. 7th, 2018 02:26 pm (UTC)
Death of B'haba not being reported
From a friend:

"I plugged D’baha's name into the NYT and got only one hit from Dec 8 so they are not reporting this. I will look at the links. I find it disturbing, to say the least, that this man, who I never heard of, "Muhiyyidin Moye aka Muhiyyidin D'baha was killed at around 1 a.m. on February 6 after being shot while riding his bicycle, his niece, Camille Weaver …”

He’s shot riding a bicycle???? And how do you die of bullet wound to the knee?

I spent a view minutes on the links. The video clip of him speaking—a minute and a half— is well worth watching. No wonder they killed him. He is intelligent, calm, well-spoken, well educated—truly would have been a potential leader. Tragic. Even Fox, trying its hardest, and trying to find the most unflattering pix, can only get to this:

He was charged with disorderly conduct and malicious injury to real property, The Post and Courier reported.
More than two years earlier, the activist was arrested after being removed from a North Charleston city council meeting for disorderly conduct after reportedly disrupting the meeting.
The first—a charge, not a conviction—was for taking down the Confederate flag.

I fear justice will not be done. The heart sickens.

This directly ties into David Brooks' article in the New York Times about how life was hopeful and okay in early 19th century England cited at Trollope19thCStudies@yahoogroups.com That killing is from the 19th century British imperial playbook -- omitting all the world but London and southern England. I would say Brooks goes beyond fatuous, although he is that, and into insane. I decided he irritates me more than Trump (though I am more frightened of Trump (my computer wants to spell check him into Trauma, not a bad idea) because of his power) because at least Trump doesn’t pretend to any sort of faux reasonableness.

I think of Weisel in Night having a Jewish character say Hitler is the only one he trusts, because he is the only one who hasn’t lied to us. I don’t trust Trump—but same idea—he’s at least openly racist and irrational. Well, thank the heavens Brooks will never be elected … but I shouldn’t say that ..."

My reply:

Heart-breaking. It used to be a black leader could rise into prominence. Ruthlessness now unstoppable and he's not allowed to get further than disrupting a council meeting, helping a girl take down a confederate flag:

(The real idiocy of Brook's article is why talk of the early 19th century: it's a distraction ...)

I did omit on Trollope19thCStudies@yahoogroups.com in response to the Brooks's essay how in my area nowadays traffic moves at snail paces in local areas, so fearful are people (rightly) of the cops.

Bleak irony: Malcolm X's comments no longer operable:

I think there are plenty of good people in America, but there are also plenty of bad people in America and the bad ones are the ones who seem to have all the power and be in these positions to block things that you and I need. Because this is the situation, you and I have to preserve the right to do what is necessary to bring an en d to that situation, and it doesn't mean that I advocate violence, but at the same time I am not against using violence in self-defense. I don't even call it violence when it's self-defense, I call it intelligence. - Malcolm X

Miss Drake

Latest Month

November 2019


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow